George Floyd: Convicted Derek Chauvin’s Lawyer Files Motion For New Trial

An attorney for Derek Chauvin filed a motion for a new trial on Tuesday.

The former Minneapolis police officer was convicted on April 20 of second degree unintentional murder, second degree manslaughter and third degree murder in the death of George Floyd.

Read Also: Derek Chauvin Convicted Of Murder Of George Floyd…Faces Up To 40 Years In Jail
The four-page document, filed by attorney Eric Nelson, details a number of errors the defense believes were made during the trial which violated Chauvin’s constitutional rights to a due process and a fair trial.

Those include allegations of mistakes made by Hennepin Judge Peter Cahill, prosecutorial misconduct, juror misconduct, witness intimidation and the impact of publicity.

George FloydThe court filing alleges the publicity during the trial threatened its fairness, and a defense expert witness was intimidated after he testified, but before the jury deliberated.

Read Also: Baba Ijesha: Nigerian Laws Need To Be Amended On All Levels – Busola Dakolo
“The publicity here was so pervasive and so prejudicial before and during this trial that it amounted to a structural defect in the proceedings,” Nelson wrote.

Nelson accused the jury of committing misconduct and may have “felt threatened or intimidated, felt race-based pressure during the proceedings, and/or failed to adhere to instructions during deliberations,” the motion read.


The Court “abused its discretion” in not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury, the court filing says.

The court also “abused its discretion when it submitted instructions to the jury that failed to accurately reflect the law” in reference to the second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and authorized use of force, the document read.

READ:  Tragic! Cultists Behead Three In Imo...Escape With Their Heads

No specific incident or juror were noted in the motion. Nelson also wrote the prosecutors committed misconduct “including but not limited to: disparaging the Defense; improper vouching; and failing to adequately prepare its witnesses.”

Photo Credit: Getty

Leave a Reply